Models, combined

One model gives you an answer. Three give you the truth about it.

Every model is confidently wrong sometimes, each in its own way. Lippa's multi-model surfaces put independent frontier models on the same problem, so blind spots surface before you commit.

Consensus

Watch them argue. Keep the disagreements.

Pose a hard question. Three frontier models answer independently, then see each other's answers across rounds, revising, pushing back, conceding where the evidence is strong, and surfacing what the others missed.

The result clusters their claims and scores each by support and divergence. You get a final view with explicit agreement, and explicit disagreement, which is usually where the real decision lives.

Made for: architecture decisions, spec validation, "which do we pick?", "is this sound?"

Roundtable

Many angles, one pass

The fastest way to a rounded answer: ask once, and three frontier models take your question in different roles, analytical reasoner, domain expert, contrarian steelman, while a fourth writes the synthesis.

You toggle it on per message, like extended thinking. One flat credit price, shown before you run.

Document Reviewer

Three reviewers, one prioritised verdict

Hand over a document, uploaded, pasted or from an artifact. Three independent reviewer models critique it in parallel; a master pass merges everything into deduplicated, prioritised feedback, and from the second iteration, a revised draft.